Who is Taurus? The doubt creeps in, because the question really is not rhetoric, although for many the answer is obvious. Obvious perhaps, certainly not the same for everyone.
Taurus is a sports club, so its possession is to invest money in it or is it will survive forever as a historical memory and lifeblood? It 'the President of the fans or grenade? The answer
simplest and most pragmatic is just one: a private company is officially headed to the President that, except honorary titles of the facade, is also the one who gains or loses money depending on his managerial competence. The Torino Fc is thus Urbano Cairo.
The second option is certainly more romantic, but at the same time twisting to argue. A sports club that wants to exist in spite of the results of presidential succession and have access to a single constant: the fans. Owners pass, run the sticker album, a coach sits on the bench after another, but the colors are always the same and think about waving to tens of years same face, to replace missing ones are often family members, friends of a lifetime, the brothers of typhoid ...
Having to take care not to venture out of context answers contemporary economy, both the first and the second possibility would be partial. In football contracts Pharaonic and high cost management is really difficult to close all seasons, active, and some wealthy entrepreneur of his own pocket rimpinguerà the coffers of companies will take forever. Among the Pharaonic contracts should not be considered only as generously dished out to players, but also those related to multimedia production: Based on what we share out the proceeds of radio and television? Other factors also based on the catchment area and the number of fans been determined. So there are more fans and more money has the potential to provide a sports club.
The vicious circle would break with the popular shareholding, which the practice is largely unknown in Italy, however, the premise that its actual stability has not yet been tested in the south of the Alps, we consider that ours is a country in which the political power binds more easily to individuals, then the doubts remain about the efficiency of the shareholder. The reality, like it or not, is also currently the Bull is not handled with this system, so that the demand "for Who's the Bull "continues to set itself in place.
Rationally you get the impression that in case of medium-sized reality, what is potentially the square grenade, the choice could come under more comfortable in a diplomatic middle ground between the President and owner fans. In Italy even Moratti, surely the only real benefactor of football mogul, could dispense with a light heart to the tens and tens of millions related to TV rights and merchandising. In the absence of a true Nawab able to consider trifles 40 or 50 million euro, any owner will still need a solid background that will allow constant revenue able to recoup his personal expenditures.
So, you configure a reality of interdependence between the parties whose primary objective should be unique for both. At this point deployments proliferate.
Who guarantees us that the president is not a carpetbagger in search of easy money and popularity? A fortiori, referring to the Cairo Urban doubt could be justified: Toro took a few thousand euro, could easily speculate. On the other hand, argues the opposite camp, the investments made in recent years under the eyes of all: you can not objectively pretend not to notice the buying relatively expensive and, above all, too lucrative contracts to players who subsequently disappointed at human and sports.
On the topic: who gives us, in any event, the fans who held no financial interest in preferring this or that president? How can you give credit to the words of those who proudly says "better to fail rather than man"? However, the reply is simple: So far, we have witnessed protests directed against each of the previous five presidents, and the guarantee that there are interests in return except the good of the team is quickly established.
A question arises at this point to mind: who will guarantee the end of the fair, which companies and fans are really doing all it can for the good of the team? Not wanting to take sides or with one nor the other hand, it seems that the fight is moving on a purely personal one hand very proud that a contractor does not accept or defeat is not subjected to threats, on the other side that a identifies the man with the devil, the first in nearly two decades, it is not run screaming as soon as the temper has resulted in explicit and violent protests. On the one hand a person too busy to defend themselves from the stores, the other morbidly attracted a group from the sink. In the middle, like a shield now worn by thousands and more beatings, poor bloodless bull now.
In such a delicate moment, the face of logic more strict or more meticulous bureaucracy, the Toro may just be the first to really take care to present itself positively in the name of a minimal rescue.
conclusion, legally Torino Fc undoubtedly has a single identifiable owner, who could use the company like a toy without being punished by the law. Not being a sheik who dines on bread and gold, not being a great connoisseur of football, we only have one hope: to learn as quickly as possible to succeed in this madhouse. Wasting money is not the answer and we all understand, but not skimp on the thousands of euro will bring us very far.
On a romantic, but even more so in historical memory, the Taurus was, is and always will be represented in the first instance by his supporters. To it the task of promoting the highest quality natural to it the task of protecting, in spite of these results, the shield and honor. We can also lose the field, but we should always give out the idea of \u200b\u200bbeing inimitable. To think of it, studying a bit 'recent history of Turin, as an epiphany proved to be a rather shocking reality: we are contesting nearly twenty years. In the opinion of the writer, is not in such a way that is advancing the rights of property ...
